My little history of photography- original version
While I am
hanging on the wall, the museum guide enters the hall with the fifth
visitors’ group this day and begins to tell the history of photography. I
always find it funny to listen to him because it should actually be me, the
Daguerreotype of Louis Daguerre himself, telling it as I am a witness of the complete
development.
If I had to narrate the history, I would begin with my creation in 1844 when Louis Daguerre developed an effective method of photography. What the museum guide never often forgets to mention, but I consider as important,is the fact that creating pictures like me used to be an extremely difficult process. When my fellow images and I were brought into being, we had to go through an extremely long exposure of iodized silver plates to light. The end products were unique and very expensive. However, our invention paved the way for a rapid development.
While I am thinking
back of the good old days of my creation and the following success of the tiny
little pictures called miniatures in the 1840s, the museum guide carries on
telling the visitors’ group about early photography. In those days, people
did not dare to look back at the camera because they were afraid that the
images of themselves could look back at them. The tourist group and the guide
then move on to a wall where there are numerous pictures hanging on it. He
points at the first one and explains that these kind of pictures, namely
retouched negatives, were seen as the “revenge for art” because the aim had
been to create more beautiful pictures. “In the following years”, narrates
the tourist guide, ”early photography went through several developments, such
as the period of studio photography, were pictures with absurd props in their
background were taken or the introduction of the mezzoprint process, where
pictures were reproduced.” He forgets to add that through this new technique
the prestige or the “halo”, a circle of light on the picture created through
the long exposure time, disappeared. After 1880, photographers tried to recreate
this unique effect through faster lenses by suppressing darkness but they were
not successful.
The museum guide then
says that several years later the photographer Eugène Atget started focusing
on inconsiderable objects and set the basis for Surrealism. Thereafter, he
and the visitors leave the hall and I wonder, as always, why he never mentions
the most important fact that photography has been and will always remain a
close connection of science and art.
|
|
[424 words]
Brief
summary of peer feedback
According to my fellow students the content of my text
was good because I included many historical facts of the history of photography
but the text itself was too long. They advised me to shorten it down. Apart
from that, I had made several expression and grammatical mistakes and some
sentences were too long. My fellow students recommended rewriting all of this.
In general, they liked my text and could also identify most of the elements of
story grammar in it.
My little history of photography- final version
While I am
hanging on the wall, the museum guide enters the hall with the fifth
visitors’ group today and begins to tell the history of photography. I always
find it funny to listen to him because it should actually be me, the
Daguerreotype of Louis Daguerre himself, telling it as I am a witness of the early
days of photography.
If I had to narrate the history, I would start with my creation in 1844 when Louis Daguerre developed an effective method of photography. What the museum guide never mentions is the fact that creating pictures like me used to be an extremely difficult process. When I was brought into being, I had to go through an extremely long exposure of iodized silver plates to light. As end product, I was very expensive. Also, my invention paved the way for a rapid development.
While I am thinking
back to the time after my creation and the success of the tiny little pictures
called miniatures, the museum guide carries on telling about early
photography. People did not dare to look at the camera at that time, fearing that
the images of themselves could stare back at them. The tourist group and the
guide then move on to a wall were numerous pictures are exhibited. He points
at the first one, which is a retouched negative, and explains that these kind
of pictures were seen as the “revenge for art” because the aim had been to
create more beautiful pictures. “In the following years”, narrates the
tourist guide, ”early photography developed to studio photography, were
pictures with absurd props in the background were taken. Then the
introduction of the mezzotint process, which enabled the reproduction of
pictures, followed.” He forgets to add that through this new technique the prestige
or the “halo”, a circle of light on the picture created through the long
exposure time, disappeared. After 1880, photographers tried to recreate this unique
effect through faster lenses by suppressing darkness but they were not
successful.
The museum guide then
says that several years later the photographer Eugène Atget started focusing
on inconsiderable objects and set the basis for Surrealism. Thereafter, he
and the visitors leave the hall and I wonder, as always, why he never mentions
the most important fact that photography has been and will always remain a
close connection between science and art.
|
|
[395 words]
No comments:
Post a Comment